The Unfortunate Truth Behind Where Our Waste Ends Up

By Jordan Bailey

What would modern life be without plastics? According to the World Economic Forum, plastic production has skyrocketed over the last 50 years, growing from 16.5 million tons in 1964 to 343 million tons in 2014. But with this huge rise of plastic manufacturing comes immense negative impacts of improper or insufficient waste management, most of which affects impoverished nations that don’t have the economic stability to fix the problem. 

Mass consumption of plastics in the United States only started a little less than 70 years ago, with the first major commercial plastic spray bottle kicking off disposable consumerism. From there, single-use plastics began to make their mark in the United States, with many corporations such as Coca-Cola switching from glass bottles to plastic ones because of the significant decrease in manufacturing costs. As the demand for mass consumerism increased, so did the demand for disposables, which in turn has created a massive waste management issue within the US. According to a 2018 United States Census Bureau report, 32% of single-use plastics end up in the ocean, with the other 78% of US plastic production being shipped to developing countries with poor waste management. The worst part is, almost all the exported plastic that is being shipped overseas is also being counted as “recycled” by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Countries like Malaysia, Vietnam, India, and Indonesia accept more than 429 shipping containers of US waste every single day. This creates substantial environmental and economic issues for these countries, but many developing nations will still accept plastic waste because of the short-term economic gains that are associated with it. But even the short-term monetary benefits of accepting over 100,000 shipping containers of US waste annually will never equate to its long-term effects. 

So why does the United States send so much plastic overseas? According to Jenna Jambeck, an associate professor of engineering at the University of Georgia, it is more economical to push plastics out of the country rather than to recycle them. And with most of these developing countries trying to make a profit off of re-manufacturing US waste, no one is analyzing the underlying issues and massive risks in dumping all of this trash into these areas. “Plastic doesn’t just affect the oceans, it also pollutes the air and water on land – and it directly harms humans too,” Christine Cole said, a research associate at Loughborough University. “Poor waste management is linked to diseases or conditions such as diarrhea, cholera, respiratory illness, and eye and skin infections.” According to a WasteAid report, roughly 9 million people die every year from diseases linked to either mismanagement of waste or pollutants. 

Unfortunately, the United States is not the only developed nation sending waste to these countries. Places like the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and Japan also send plastics overseas, with Canada and South Korea even going as far as re-exporting American waste. According to Jenna Jambeck’s study, “Plastic Waste Inputs from Land into Ocean,” high waste mismanagement rates are considered 5% and larger. Most of the developing countries that accept trash have mismanagement rates of more than 80%, with both Indonesia and Vietnam having over 85%. In turn, most of these regions are forced to dump trash into local waters, because of how unbearable the waste becomes for its citizens. According to the Ocean Conservancy, 60% of the plastic trash flowing into the seas originate from China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand. Areas like the Con Vanh Beach in Vietnam are completely littered and flooded with waste, damaging the local environment and making it impossible for citizens to enjoy their homes. 

There are several reasons why the United States as well as other developed countries should stop the exportation of waste into these regions, the first being the effects that plastic waste has had on the citizens. Many of these nations receive a huge flow of trash that flood their ports and docks. Citizens like Daniel Tay from Malaysia have pushed for import restrictions to help put an end to the overflow, but most developing countries have still failed to implement regulations on waste. The second reason why the US should stop shipping trash overseas is because many Americans don’t realize how big of a problem this really is. With less than 10% of plastics being recycled in the United States, almost all waste consumption is being pumped into these areas with little to no education about it. If the US is transparent about the volume of plastic waste that is consumed and produced within the country, American citizens will be able to recognize and acknowledge how prevalent an issue single-use plastics truly are. Another huge reason why the US should stop exporting waste is because of the need for legislation to strengthen within America’s recycling system. By sending so much plastic to developing countries, the need to develop a national recycling infrastructure gets neglected. The United States needs to take responsibility for how much trash is consumed within its borders, because if not, the amount of waste that is produced will not decrease, and will only cause more pain and devastation to the nations that are being used as America’s dumping grounds. 

With climate change becoming an increasingly more imperative issue, it is only fundamentally substantial to analyze the effects that waste consumption has on the environment and people. Because the longer we allow mass consumerism to manipulate and define our everyday lives, the longer we will allow our governments and multinational corporations to take advantage of impoverished nations and the natural environment that creates and makes up our world.

ASEAN 34th Summit: Reviewing the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific

In late June 2019, in the ASEAN 34th Bangkok Summit, ten member-states agreed to adopt the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP). Throughout the summit, ASEAN acknowledged both opportunities and collective challenges facing the regional organization, and alertly demanded an urgent response to those, leading to the creation of AOIP. ASEAN must take the lead in shaping its own economic and security architecture and to ensure that such dynamic continues to bring about peace, stability, and prosperity for people in Southeast Asia and in the wider Indo-Pacific area.

Read More

Transatlantic Burden Sharing: Do as I Say Not as I Do?

Since taking office, US President Trump has time and again highlighted the lack of Transatlantic burden-sharing on security and demanded that European NATO allies strengthen their spending and capacity on defense. More recently, Washington had also began criticizing the EU’s integrative defense initiatives, accusing Brussels for pursuing an “industrial policy under the veneer of a security policy.” Can the US Trump Administration balance and simultaneously pursue both of these seemingly contradictory goals?

Read More

A Mixed Reality of The Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia

Earlier this year between April 25-27, Beijing hosted the second Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) Forum with attendance of 36 heads of state, including 9 from Southeast Asia. Yet, the future of the BRI in the region is more complicated than meets the eye due to a range of issues ranging from BRI’s vagueness to the complicated triangular relationship among China, the United States, and Southeast Asia. 

Read More

Can the United States Legally Justify an Attack Against Iran?

The combative action of shooting down an unmanned US reconnaissance drone by Iran has raised reasonable concerns among the international community about the possibility of an impending war between the sparring nations. If events continue along a path analogous to what we have been observing over the past week, the likelihood of a trigger-happy incident occurring that sparks a wider conflict unfortunately increases, at which point the legal considerations and cautions of the international community may be thrown to the wind.

Read More

Building a “Xiaokang Society”—China’s Poverty, Peasantry, Post-Socialism

Since the Opening Up and Reform of 1978, China has maintained an impressive average GDP growth rate at or above 9% and successfully lifted over 700 million people out of abject poverty. At the same time, the country’s social inequality has soared and caught the attention of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership in the last decade. While Xi has prioritized the reduction of rural poverty and build a ‘comprehensively well-off society’, China’s journey towards social equality has been—and will continue to be—a long and arduous one.

Read More

EU Elections 2019: Brussels' Game of Thrones Has Just Begun

On May 26th 2019, the three-day election marathon for the European Parliament (EP) finally came to an end, but the continent is still struggling to process its conflicting results. However, if there is one trend that has transcended national borders, it is the increasing fragmentation of the political system. With the contentious EU budget negotiations, Brexit and potentially also a trade war with the United States all coming up in the fall, the new EC President better get off to a running start – whomever it may be.

Read More

Arguments from Another Side: Al Qaeda and the Jus ad Bellum

Can terrorism ever be justified? While ‘terrorism’ is a nebulous term that is often difficult to justify due to the predominantly negative view of the subject, one can apply the concepts of jus ad bellum towards the phenomena, namely the right authority, just cause, last resort, as well as the reasonable hope of success of a violent act. A closer case study of Al Qaeda against this definition may indeed shed light upon the original question and even bring about another controversial but thought-provoking perspective.

Read More

Descendants of the Yellow Emperor: Prospects of Chinese Reunification with Taiwan Under Xi Jinping

Commemorating the 40th anniversary of the “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan”, Chinese President Xi Jinping reaffirmed the country’s commitment towards Reunification with Taiwan as espoused by the landmark 1979 proclamation. On the other side of the Strait, Taiwanese (Republic of China) leader Tsai Ing-wen continues to stress the irreconcilable differences as an insurmountable barrier to the People’s Republic’s propose “One Country, Two Systems” reunification plan. As Xi and Tsai have both taken hardline stances on the subject, the possibility for compromise on the subject may continue to dwindle in the near future.

Read More

North Korea Shifts Their Strategy

After the collapse of US-North Korea negotiations in Hanoi earlier this March, Kim Jong-un has begun to pursue a foreign policy strategy that may not necessarily include a diplomatic relationship with the United States. This follows Kim’s meeting with Russian President Putin in Vladivostok in April, a move that aims to improve North Korea’s economic partnerships and increase leverage in future negotiations with the United States. If the United States does not respond to North Korea’s shifting strategy, tensions may rise once again.

Read More

Donald Trump’s New Israel-Palestine Peace Plan

In June 2019, the United States Trump administration is scheduled to unveil the new White House plan, which involve the reinstitution of funds for Palestine but no two-state solution. The new plan has come under criticism from Mohammad Shtayyeh, Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority, as well as over thirty politicians from the European Union. As the Trump administration continues to endorse controversial Israeli policies,it threatens to end the credibility of the United States as a trustworthy third-party and sabotage the prospects of reaching an agreement in the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

Read More

Russian Warships Arrive the Philippines Should the United States be Worried about the Philippines’ Independent Foreign Policy?

In April 2019, three Russian ships docked in Manila for five-day “goodwill visit” amid the escalating tensions in the South China Sea. The move follows President Duterte’s three foreign policy goals of separating the Philippines’ foreign policy from the United States, establishing stronger ties with non-traditions partners like Russia, Japan, and India, and improving relations with China. As the foreign policy of the Philippines becomes increasingly balanced and independent, what are the implications for other Southeast Asian states and the United States?

Read More

Japan’s Move Away from Pacifism

Last December, Shinzo Abe’s cabinet approved plans to significantly increase Japan’s defense spending. The new five-year defense plan is seen as a shift away from Japan’s constitutionally-enshrined principles of pacifism. While the Abe administration maintains that the budget changes are in response to the rise of perceived regional threats, Japanese public opinion remains sharply divided.

Read More

Why Are the Uyghurs Still Facing Human Rights Violations in China?

In 2019, Beijing continues to escalate a domestic campaign of detention and surveillance against the Uyghurs, a Muslim Turkic minority that primarily inhabit China’s far-western Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. While some members of the United Nations, especially Muslim allies of China, support China’s assertion that the reeducation camps are a national security project to combat extremism and terrorism, others have called to stop the persecution. Why haven’t they?

Read More

Nearly Five Years After the Umbrella Movement - Where is Hong Kong Now?

While imperialism has often led to disastrous outcomes for colonized states, Britain’s colonization of Hong Kong was an outlier in almost all respects. Though the United Kingdom returned Hong Kong to China in 1997, the succeeding decades have seen increasing tensions between Beijing and the Special Administrative Region, which culminated in the 2014 Umbrella Movement. Five years on, how has the situation developed?

Read More

Overlooking Culture in American Foreign Policy

It seems that Samuel Huntington’s “The Clash of Civilizations.” has drawn the ire of Stephen Walt, numerous Foreign Affairs scholars, and students of IR everywhere.  Yet, in the era of ‘globalization’, culture is taking a more prominent place on the global stage, including the waves of right wing populism throughout the West and rise of illiberal states in a number of other states. As international relations theory today is largely dominated by the tenets of realism and liberalism, Huntington perhaps suggests an unconsidered factor: culture. 

Read More

Globalization and the Future World Order

While it seems that China is poised to become a dominant power along with the United States, and the world will become more interconnected through globalization, these two changes in the future world order cannot steer the world toward more reciprocity. What would the future world order look like under a multipolar system?


Read More

The EU Seems to Not Trust Their Leaders; Should We?

The past month has seen a number of highly anticipated votes in European Union nations. As the United Kingdom struggles to determine the process of executing Brexit (if at all), Theresa May survived her attempted removal 325 to 306. Economically distraught Greece has fared no better as embattled Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras narrowly escapes a vote of no-confidence by a mere 3 tallies to remain in power. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has recently become the third EU leader to be faced with disruption of his direct political power. The outlook for the coming months in European politics is one filled with legislative strife for nations both at home and throughout the EU

Read More

The Venezuelan Crisis: A Proxy Conflict?

In recent years, Venezuela has faced shortages, hectic inflation, and political repression; yet, the United States, Russia and other foreign powers have chosen now to pay acute attention. The U.S. must not fall back upon the historical interventions made in Latin America with the justification of promoting democracy and combating communism. The country must not turn into yet another battleground for Cold War powers.

Read More

Putin Is Testing NATO’s Fortitude

On 25 November 2018, Russian ships carrying elite Spetsnaz soldiers seized two Ukrainian naval gunships, killing of six Ukrainian sailors and capturing thirty more. Tensions between Ukraine and Russia reached a climax last November and have since remained high. As the European Union continues to fracture and as the United States Trump administration continues to hold a soft spot for Russia, future acts of aggression will become more likely.

Read More